Industry Insights
13 min read

Workers Compensation Shows Strongest Softening: Save 10-20% on Premiums Now

Workers' comp rates are declining faster than any other commercial line thanks to a $16B reserve surplus. Learn how to maximize savings in this buyer's market.

C
Written by
Christie Williams
Workers Compensation Shows Strongest Softening: Save 10-20% on Premiums Now

CHICAGO, IL – Workers' compensation insurance is experiencing the strongest market softening of any commercial line in 2025, with rates declining 4-6% in most regions as insurers sit on a $16 billion reserve surplus and compete aggressively for market share. Combined with declining claim frequency—which has fallen to historic lows due to improved workplace safety, telematics, and claims management—employers have unprecedented opportunities to reduce workers' comp costs while maintaining or enhancing coverage.

According to industry reports, the workers' comp market has remained consistently favorable for buyers for over a decade, but 2025 conditions are the most competitive since before 2010. Surplus reserves, declining frequency, and intense competition among carriers create a perfect storm for employers willing to shop coverage, optimize program structure, and demonstrate strong safety performance. Employers leveraging these conditions are achieving 10-20% premium reductions compared to 2023-2024, with some exceeding 25% through strategic initiatives.

For businesses of all sizes, understanding the drivers behind workers' comp softening and implementing targeted strategies to capitalize on favorable conditions can deliver substantial cost savings—potentially hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars annually for larger employers—while improving worker safety and reducing claim costs.

Why Workers Comp Is Softening So Dramatically

$16 Billion Reserve Surplus

What it means: Workers' comp insurers hold $16 billion more in reserves than actuarially necessary to pay future claims.

Why it exists:

  • Declining frequency: Claim rates have fallen 40%+ since 2010 due to improved safety, shift from manufacturing to services, technology monitoring work environments, and proactive claims management
  • Conservative reserving: Insurers set aside reserves based on historical loss patterns. As frequency declines faster than expected, reserves prove excessive
  • Limited investment returns: Low interest rates mean reserves don't grow as projected, but claim payouts decline even faster

Impact on rates: Insurers with excess reserves must deploy capital to generate returns. This creates competitive pressure—reduce premiums to grow market share and deploy capital productively.

Historic Low Claim Frequency

Workers' comp claims frequency (claims per 100 employees) has declined from 4-5 per 100 in 2010 to 2-2.5 per 100 in 2025:

Drivers:

  • Safety improvements: OSHA compliance, proactive safety programs, better training
  • Technology: Wearables, sensors, telematics monitoring risky behaviors and preventing injuries
  • Economic shift: Manufacturing declining, services increasing (office workers have 60% fewer injuries than factory workers)
  • Claims management: Medical management, return-to-work programs, fraud detection reducing claim costs
  • Aging workforce: Older, more experienced workers have fewer accidents than younger, inexperienced workers

Result: Insurers paying fewer claims than premium pricing anticipates, generating underwriting profits and enabling rate reductions.

Intense Competition for Market Share

After years of flat or declining written premiums (as rates fell and employers reduced headcount), workers' comp insurers want to grow:

Competitive dynamics:

  • Traditional carriers: Liberty Mutual, Travelers, Hartford, Zurich competing to regain market share lost to state funds and alternative markets
  • State funds: Competitive state funds (California, Colorado, Maryland, others) offering aggressive rates to private employers
  • Group captives and alternative markets: Employers banding together in captive insurance structures, creating competitive pressure on traditional carriers
  • Insurtech entrants: Digital-first carriers (Pie Insurance, Next Insurance) offering instant quotes and streamlined service at competitive rates

Result: Employers with strong safety records receive multiple competitive proposals with rates 15-30% below renewal.

Improved Medical Cost Management

Medical costs account for 50-60% of workers' comp losses. Advancements in medical management reduce costs:

Medical cost controls:

  • Preferred provider networks (PPNs): Directing injured workers to high-quality, cost-effective providers
  • Utilization review: Ensuring medical treatment is appropriate and necessary
  • Pharmacy benefit management: Controlling prescription drug costs (particularly opioids)
  • Return-to-work programs: Getting injured workers back to modified or light duty faster
  • Telemedicine: Enabling faster, lower-cost treatment for minor injuries

Result: Medical costs per claim declining 3-5% annually, improving insurer profitability and enabling rate reductions.

Regional Market Variations: Where to Find Best Rates

Most Competitive Markets (10-20%+ Savings Potential)

California: Highly competitive market with state fund, private carriers, and alternative markets all competing aggressively. Employers with strong mods can save 15-25%.

Florida: Multiple carriers entering market, driving competition. Employers with clean loss history save 12-18%.

Texas: Non-subscription option (employers can opt out of workers' comp) creates competitive pressure on carriers. Employers save 10-20% by shopping aggressively.

Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina: Growing markets with increasing carrier competition. Savings of 10-15% available.

Moderately Competitive Markets (5-10% Savings)

Midwest states (Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin): Stable markets with moderate competition. Employers with good loss history save 5-10%.

Mountain West (Colorado, Utah, Arizona): Competitive state funds create pressure on private carriers. Savings of 7-12%.

Less Competitive Markets (0-5% Savings)

Monopolistic state fund states (Wyoming, Washington, Ohio for most employers, North Dakota): No private market competition limits savings opportunities. Focus on experience mod reduction and dividend programs.

Small rural states: Limited carrier presence restricts competition. Employers may need to access surplus lines or out-of-state markets.

Strategies to Maximize Workers Comp Savings

Strategy 1: Shop Coverage Aggressively (Every 1-2 Years)

Why: Workers' comp is highly commoditized—coverage is standardized by state law. Primary differentiation is price and service. Shopping extensively maximizes savings.

How to shop effectively:

Obtain 5-7 competitive quotes:

  • 2-3 traditional national carriers (Travelers, Hartford, Liberty Mutual)
  • 1-2 regional carriers or state fund (if available)
  • 1-2 alternative markets (group captive, PEO, insurtech)

Provide complete information:

  • 5 years loss runs (detailed claim information)
  • Current and projected payroll by class code
  • Safety program documentation
  • Return-to-work program details
  • Claims management procedures

Time it right:

  • Start 90-120 days before renewal
  • Allow 4-6 weeks for carrier underwriting
  • Reserve 2-3 weeks for proposal analysis and negotiation

Example: A manufacturing company with $250K annual workers' comp premium obtained 6 quotes:

  • Incumbent renewal: $248K (-1%)
  • Traditional carrier quotes: $225K-$238K (-10% to -14%)
  • State fund quote: $215K (-14%)
  • Group captive quote: $210K + potential dividend (-16% to -20%)
  • Selected group captive, saving $40K+ annually with dividend potential

Expected savings: 10-20% for employers with good loss history, 20-30%+ for excellent performers.

Strategy 2: Optimize Experience Modification Factor (Mod)

What it is: Experience mod compares your actual losses to expected losses for businesses your size in your industry. Mod >1.00 means worse than expected (premium surcharge); <1.00 means better than expected (premium discount).

Impact on premium: A mod of 1.20 increases premium 20%; mod of 0.80 reduces premium 20%.

How to optimize:

Review mod calculation annually: Request detailed mod worksheet from NCCI or state rating bureau. Identify errors:

  • Claims assigned to wrong employer (common with similar names)
  • Claims not closed when they should be
  • Claims miscoded or overstated
  • Payroll misclassified

Challenge errors: File corrections with rating bureau for any errors identified—can reduce mod by 0.05-0.15 (5-15% premium reduction).

Focus on frequency, not severity: Mod formula penalizes claim frequency more than severity. Five $10K claims hurt your mod more than one $50K claim. Focus on preventing accidents, not just reducing costs.

Implement aggressive claims management:

  • Report claims immediately (delays increase costs)
  • Direct injured workers to preferred providers
  • Implement return-to-work programs (getting workers back even to modified duty significantly reduces claim costs)
  • Fight fraudulent or questionable claims aggressively

Example: A construction company with mod of 1.35 (35% surcharge) reviewed mod calculation and found:

  • 3 claims incorrectly assigned (should have been different employer with similar name)
  • 2 claims not closed despite full recovery
  • 1 claim overstated by $15K (coding error)
  • Filed corrections, reducing mod to 1.18 (saving $42,500 annually on $250K base premium)

Potential savings: 5-20% premium reduction for employers with high mods that can be reduced through corrections and claims management.

Strategy 3: Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) Programs

Traditional workers' comp: Pay annual premium upfront based on estimated payroll, then true-up at audit 12-18 months later. If actual payroll exceeds estimate, you owe additional premium. If under, you receive refund 12-18 months after policy expires.

Pay-As-You-Go: Premium calculated and paid based on actual payroll each pay period (integrated with payroll system). No large upfront payment, no true-up audit, no unexpected audit bills.

Advantages:

Cash flow improvement: Instead of paying $100K upfront annually, pay $1,900 per week as you run payroll. Frees up $80-90K in cash flow.

Accurate premiums: Pay on actual payroll, not estimates. Eliminates surprises from audit true-ups.

Simplified administration: No annual audit hassles, no disputes over payroll classifications.

Example: A seasonal landscaping company with $150K annual workers' comp premium:

  • Traditional: Pay $150K in March (start of season), receive $20K refund in December next year (18 months later) when actual payroll comes in under estimate
  • PAYG: Pay $2,900 per week during busy season (April-October), $800 per week off-season. Cash flow improvement of $120K+ during critical season months

Who benefits most: Businesses with seasonal operations, fast-growing companies (don't overpay based on outdated payroll estimates), and businesses wanting to improve cash flow.

Cost: PAYG typically costs same as traditional annual payment, sometimes 2-5% more, offset by cash flow benefits.

Strategy 4: Group Captives and Alternative Risk Transfer

What it is: 10-30 employers with similar safety cultures band together in a group captive insurance company. Members share risk and retain underwriting profits.

How it works:

  • Captive charges premium (typically 15-30% below traditional market)
  • Members retain portion of risk (typically first $500K per claim)
  • Captive purchases excess insurance to cap losses
  • If group has favorable claims experience, members receive dividends (20-40% of premium)

Advantages:

Lower costs: Combination of reduced premiums (15-30% below market) plus potential dividends (20-40% of premium) can save 30-50% over 3-5 years.

Profit sharing: Underwriting profits returned to members rather than retained by commercial insurer.

Enhanced services: Group captives typically provide superior loss control, claims management, and safety consulting vs. traditional carriers.

Multi-year stability: Captives provide rate stability over 3-5 years vs. annual renewal volatility with traditional carriers.

Disadvantages:

Risk retention: Members retain more risk—bad claims years can result in assessments.

Multi-year commitment: Typically 3-5 year commitment vs. annual traditional policies.

Eligibility: Minimum premium requirements ($100K-$250K+ typically) and safety standards (mod <1.10-1.20 typically).

Example: A group of 15 construction companies with combined $2.5M annual workers' comp premium:

  • Traditional market: $2.5M annual premium (assuming 1.10 average mod)
  • Group captive: $2.0M annual premium (-20%)
  • Year 1 dividend: $400K (20% of premium)
  • Year 2 dividend: $500K (25% of premium)
  • Year 3 dividend: $450K (22.5% of premium)
  • 3-year total cost: $6.0M premium - $1.35M dividends = $4.65M net cost
  • Traditional market 3-year cost: $7.5M
  • Savings: $2.85M over 3 years (38%)

Who should consider: Employers with $100K+ annual workers' comp premium, strong safety culture, mod <1.20, and willingness to commit 3-5 years.

Strategy 5: Implement Telematics and Safety Technology

Insurers reward proactive safety investments with premium discounts:

Telematics for commercial vehicles:

  • Monitor driver behaviors (speeding, hard braking, distracted driving)
  • Provide coaching and training based on data
  • Reduce vehicle-related workers' comp claims 20-30%
  • Qualify for 10-15% premium discounts

Wearable sensors:

  • Monitor worker postures, movements, repetitive motions
  • Alert workers to risky behaviors (improper lifting, excessive bending)
  • Reduce ergonomic injuries 25-35%
  • Qualify for 10-20% premium discounts

Environmental sensors:

  • Monitor temperature, humidity, air quality, noise
  • Alert when conditions reach unsafe levels
  • Reduce environment-related injuries 15-25%
  • Qualify for 5-10% premium discounts

Example: A warehouse operation with $180K annual workers' comp premium:

  • Implemented wearable sensors monitoring lifting and bending ($25K investment)
  • Reduced ergonomic injuries from 8 per year to 3 per year (-63%)
  • Mod improved from 1.15 to 1.05 over 2 years (9% premium reduction = $16K savings)
  • Received 12% safety technology discount ($22K savings)
  • Total annual savings: $38K (21% premium reduction)
  • ROI: 152% in year 1, 100%+ ongoing

Strategy 6: Aggressive Medical and Claims Management

Effective claims management is the single most impactful way to reduce workers' comp costs long-term:

Report claims immediately: Delays increase costs by 30-50%. Report all claims same day or next day to insurer.

Designate panel of physicians: Direct injured workers to occupational health providers experienced with workers' comp (not emergency rooms or random doctors who may be unfamiliar with work injury management).

Implement return-to-work program: Get injured workers back to modified or light duty ASAP, even if they can only work 2-3 hours per day. Every day at home increases claim costs exponentially.

  • Workers returning to modified duty within 1 week: Average $5-8K claim cost
  • Workers off work for 4+ weeks: Average $25-40K claim cost

Manage medical treatment actively:

  • Use nurse case managers for serious injuries
  • Ensure medical providers understand job requirements so they can tailor treatment
  • Question unnecessary treatment, excessive prescriptions, or extended disability

Challenge questionable claims:

  • Investigate fraud indicators (claim reported Monday after weekend, injury not witnessed, previous similar claims)
  • Hire investigators if substantial fraud suspected
  • Defend non-compensable claims aggressively (pre-existing conditions, non-work injuries, exaggerated disabilities)

Example: A manufacturing facility with 12-15 workers' comp claims per year averaging $18K each ($216K annual claim costs):

  • Implemented aggressive medical management program
  • Designated panel of occupational health physicians
  • Established return-to-work program with 50+ modified duty assignments
  • Hired nurse case manager for claims >$10K
  • Results after 18 months:
    • Claim frequency unchanged (13-14 per year)
    • Average claim cost reduced from $18K to $9K (-50%)
    • Annual claim costs: $120K (-$96K or -44%)
    • Experience mod improved from 1.22 to 1.08 over 3 years (12% premium savings)

Key Takeaways

Workers' compensation shows strongest market softening of any commercial line thanks to $16B reserve surplus, historic low claim frequency, and intense competition.

Employers can achieve 10-20% premium savings by shopping coverage aggressively, with some achieving 30-40% through strategic initiatives (group captives, mod optimization, claims management).

Experience mod optimization saves 5-20%—review mod calculation annually for errors, focus on claim frequency reduction, and implement aggressive return-to-work programs.

Pay-as-you-go programs improve cash flow by 50-80% for seasonal businesses and eliminate audit surprises for growing companies.

Group captives deliver 30-50% savings over 3-5 years for employers with $100K+ premiums and strong safety cultures through reduced premiums and profit sharing.

Safety technology investments provide 15-20% ROI through injury reduction plus premium discounts for telematics, wearables, and environmental sensors.

Aggressive claims management reduces costs 30-50% through immediate reporting, physician panels, return-to-work programs, and medical management.

The soft market creates strategic opportunity to reduce workers' comp costs while improving worker safety and claims outcomes. Employers that act decisively—shopping coverage, optimizing mods, implementing technology, and managing claims aggressively—can achieve substantial long-term savings while those passively renewing will miss historic opportunities.


Ready to capitalize on the workers' comp soft market? With rates declining and insurers competing aggressively, employers with strong safety records can achieve significant savings. Working with experienced brokers who specialize in workers' compensation ensures you access the most competitive markets and optimize program structure for maximum savings.

Sources: Marsh Global Insurance Market Index, NCCI Reports, Workers' Compensation Market Analysis